I'm scaling down my ambitions. Stashed files can't have notes attached.
I think that encourages a higher scale of development on such apps than
is currently justified, given you're liable to lose all your work if you
upgrade LÖVE.
New plan: just name stashed files with a numeric suffix.
The remaining open question is now around unstash. Should unstash copy
or move?
We can create them and see them on the file dialogs, but not yet load
them back.
I want stashed files to remember the original filename. I think that
implies the ability to add a note to them. But I don't yet know how to
represent the note on disk.
And this creates cascading questions, like should editing a stash file
continue to modify it or create a new version? How to create a new
version? Should unstash copy or move?
Some considerations in the design so far:
* Desired flows:
* start typing into a new pane, then save to a filename
* load from a filename, then continue typing/running
* save as a second file
* Should we autosave? I think not yet, because my editor's undo/redo
functionality is not accessible yet on mobile. Android devices can't
press 'ctrl', and the hotkeys aren't very discoverable.
(I considered menu options for 'undo' and 'redo', but they won't be
very ergonomic because my undo/redo functionality is primitive and
doesn't support grouping similar operations. Now you're stuck tapping
'>>', then 'undo' and losing one character. Then the menu closes and
you have to do it all over again.)
Another knock against autosave on mobile: autosave on quit is
unreliable. At least on my Android devices, LÖVE doesn't trigger
love.quit when you swipe away an app. iOS of course has no such notion
in the first place.
* Menu buttons take up space, and I'm loath to expend 2 more buttons.
However, I don't see a good alternative:
* We can't use a single button to bind a filename to a pane until we
get autosave.
* Save on run? It doesn't save a button, but maybe we can keep 'save'
up top because we'll want to keep hitting it in the absence of
autosave. However, I don't want to lose data just because I started
typing out a long program that never got to a runnable point.
* I'd like to keep 'save' always up. But newcomers might have more
trouble finding things if load and save are separated from each other.
Seems like the sort of thing Mike complained about before the current
button organization.
==> conclusion: no autosave, 2 buttons, load and save
* I want to follow MiniIDE and only save to a single directory (no
subdirectories, even). Simplifies the file dialog.
* Where should this directory live? Source base risks growing really
large and unwieldy over time as we share files between lots of LÖVE
apps. At least, Mike has that problem. Save dir is utterly
inaccessible to other apps -- including later versions of this one.
Once you delete one version of an app (say before installing a new
version) the only way to find your files is to wade through lots of
cryptic directories inside source dir. And you'd need a new LÖVE app
to do that.
==> conclusion: save to a fixed subdir of source base dir. That way only
Lua Carousel will save there, but different versions share a common
space.
* Should examples be savable? If yes, we could have conflicts. If no,
it feels like a gotcha when someone starts editing an example.
==> conclusion: allow examples to be saved, but that creates a new copy
of them on restart. It'll be weird that the order changes, but seems
like the best option.
* Where to show the current filename? I don't want to further reduce
space for buttons. A smaller font seems necessary here to squeeze the
filename into an interstitial of the UI.
Still to do: providing a non-existing file to load/save. I plan a
command palette UI for filtering or selecting a new file.